MINI-ROOK / BUILD LOG 025
The Editorial Repair Desk
Three deliberate repair options that leave saved drafts untouched
TECHNICAL CHECKPOINT
What this build actually records.
- Stack and method
- Conservative classification · risk phrases · unsaved browser editor
- Recorded progress
- Syntax and isolated suggestion checks pass; creator sees three choices and F5 restoring the persisted draft.
- Still open at this checkpoint
- Replacement accuracy and prose quality are unverified; subtle claims and generic wording need further work.
Software development on an existing workstation. This entry does not establish a new robot, custom hardware build or autonomous publishing capability.
TEST STATUS / SEPARATE FROM THE ORIGINAL RECORD
What later checks established.
Syntax and isolated suggestion checks pass; creator sees three choices and F5 restoring the persisted draft.
Still open: Replacement accuracy and prose quality are unverified; subtle claims and generic wording need further work.
01 / BUILD LOG 025
The original development record
Mini-Rook gains an Editorial Repair Desk beneath the existing Check claims report for GitHub release-based drafts. It identifies potentially unsupported release statements based on the conservative Evidence Editor classification and a narrow risk-phrase detector, then offers three human-controlled choices: safer generic wording, a visible verification placeholder, or removal of the claim.
Choosing a suggestion changes only the browser's unsaved draft text. The user must inspect the full draft and choose Save edit separately; saving resets editorial status to draft under the existing queue rules. The Repair Desk neither approves nor publishes a post, and its suggestions are not verified rewrites of product facts. Current heuristics intentionally prioritize safety over natural marketing prose, and can miss subtler claims.
Verified: Python and JavaScript syntax checks PASS. Isolated suggestion test produced the three options and passed. Human UI acceptance confirmed the Repair Desk renders the three options. The creator selected Safer wording on the offline/activation claim and observed that only the browser editor text changed; reloading with F5 restored the original persisted draft. This verifies non-persistence without Save edit, not the factual correctness or editorial quality of the replacement. Filtering out hashtags, link captions and overly generic wording remains future work.
Status: READY TO PUBLISH — scoped human UI acceptance PASS; editorial limitations remain. Chapter VII — The Raven Takes Initiative.
KEEP FOLLOWING THE BIRD